<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 79th Annual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevish.com/archives/307/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevish.com/archives/307</link>
	<description>From a mind that only One can understand</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lorelei</title>
		<link>http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11784</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11784</guid>
		<description>I'm sure eventually they'll have to do away with the numbers. I can't imagine them saying, "And now, the 1,256th Annual Acadamy Awards Ceremony." Using the numbers makes them feel grown up; more prestigious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure eventually they&#8217;ll have to do away with the numbers. I can&#8217;t imagine them saying, &#8220;And now, the 1,256th Annual Acadamy Awards Ceremony.&#8221; Using the numbers makes them feel grown up; more prestigious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevish</title>
		<link>http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11733</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11733</guid>
		<description>I rounded the euros to the 100th of a cent, give me a break. That's still 2 US cents if you round it to the thousanth of a US cent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rounded the euros to the 100th of a cent, give me a break. That&#8217;s still 2 US cents if you round it to the thousanth of a US cent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jma89 (John Ambrose)</title>
		<link>http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11732</link>
		<dc:creator>jma89 (John Ambrose)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11732</guid>
		<description>Yes. Strange people indeed.

You 0.01999256 cents worth? (Exchange rates are fun.) :P 8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Strange people indeed.</p>
<p>You 0.01999256 cents worth? (Exchange rates are fun.) <img src='http://stevish.com/wpstevishcom/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> <img src='http://stevish.com/wpstevishcom/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benson</title>
		<link>http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11680</link>
		<dc:creator>Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevish.com/archives/307#comment-11680</guid>
		<description>what is up with the term new and improved? If it is new, how can it be improved?
Or Brand new? Brand adds nothing to new....
Strange people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is up with the term new and improved? If it is new, how can it be improved?<br />
Or Brand new? Brand adds nothing to new&#8230;.<br />
Strange people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
